Hidden by not really trying to hide, Ravindra Jadeja the batsman

India versus Australia second Test: Ravindra Jadeja—playing his 50th Test—has spent not exactly a fourth of his Test profession in SENA (South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia) nations. On the off chance that he didn’t make the cut simply as a batsman, it was on the grounds that Jadeja was viewed as a spinner first.

India have now taken the principal innings lead in an uncommon four continuous Tests in Australia. Two of those (81 of every a 204-run seventh wicket remain with Rishabh Pant in 2019 at Sydney and Sunday’s 40* in the solid 104-run remain with Ajinkya Rahane) wouldn’t have been conceivable without Ravindra Jadeja.

However, he has never been viewed as an unadulterated batsman. Not so much as two Ranji Trophy triple hundreds of years have changed that. It is difficult being Jadeja. Defender second to none and a cultivated left-arm spinner with top of the line batting certifications, his worth is unchallenged in the more limited arrangements. Tests however haven’t been benevolent to him. Second spinner at home, overlooked abroad, one can comprehend if Jadeja feels duped because of India’s blinkered vision that will not remember him as a batsman who can bowl, not the opposite way around.

Accordingly, Jadeja—playing his 50th Test—has spent not exactly a fourth of his Test vocation in SENA (South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia) nations. In the event that he didn’t make the cut absolutely as a batsman, it was on the grounds that Jadeja was viewed as a spinner first. Furthermore, he isn’t viewed as India’s best turn alternative abroad. R Ashwin has held that mantle. That was fine as long as Ashwin contributed with the bat as well. With runs evaporating in the last couple of seasons (Ashwin’s last fifty came in 2017—his normal in 2019 is 12 and in 2020 is 4.75), Ashwin as a spinner is feeling the squeeze to perform. Then again, Jadeja has found the middle value of 51.75 with the bat away from home since the beginning of 2017. What’s more, he stays as effective—monetary if not penetrative—with the ball.

Heidi Phillips

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *